Skip to content

SampleSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Sample · v1.0 · Sample edition

Enterprise Sales Playbook

How to find, win and grow EV-charging and fleet-energy accounts

Prepared for
Garallen Company (fictional)
Worked example
Dennergo (fictional)
Prepared by
Cashewleads
Date
October 2026

This is a sample Cashewleads Enterprise Playbook. Garallen Company, Dennergo, every other company, every person and every figure in it are fictional and illustrative. They are modelled on a real engagement to show the depth and format of the deliverable, not to describe any real business.

Before you begin

About this playbook

What this playbook is

  • A field guide to Garallen Company's end-to-end enterprise motion, from first signal to expansion
  • Grounded in what Garallen Company actually sells, to whom and how, with every claim tagged by confidence
  • Worked through one live Tier 1 target, Dennergo, so every template has a real example
  • A gut check for deal milestones, deal reviews and forecast calls

What it isn't

  • A product manual or a script to read word for word
  • A price book: commercial figures are placeholders until RevOps confirms them
  • Approved marketing copy: proof points need reference permission before external use
  • Final: items marked Assumption or Inferred need an owner to validate them

Built for three challenges

Ramp new sellers fast

One shared definition of each stage, each exit criterion and each artifact, so a new AE can run a full cycle in their first quarter.

Forecast with evidence

MEDDPICC-D scoring and stage gates turn opinions into proof, so Commit means committed.

Land and expand on purpose

Six land-and-expand motions, a tiering model and a trigger library point effort at the accounts most likely to buy now and grow later.

How to read the confidence tags

Sourced
Stated in a cited source (see the Evidence Register, Appendix B).
Inferred
Reasoned from sources; directionally right, wording may change.
Assumption
Enablement placeholder (targets, thresholds, tools). Validate before use.

The short version

Executive summary

Garallen Company sells decisions, not software. Every Garallen Company deal starts with a question a buyer must answer with money on the line: which sites to build, which to upgrade, how big the battery should be, whether to wait for a grid upgrade, which depot to electrify first. Plan answers that question in minutes, a Garallen Company analyst checks the answer within a business day, and the buyer leaves with a report that a CFO or a lender will accept.

The market has turned in Garallen Company's favour. With federal credits for new charging property and commercial EVs gone, and many first-generation networks now aging, operators can no longer build on optimism and a spreadsheet. Every project in flight needs to be re-modelled, and every underperforming site needs a plan. That makes rigorous modelling, and brownfield optimization in particular, a timely wedge.

The team is small, so the motion has to be lean: one AE can run a full cycle, the CEO and three industry advisors open executive doors, and partners (EPCs, consultancies, conversion specialists) extend reach. This playbook gives that team one shared process: eight stages with exit criteria, MEDDPICC-D qualification (MEDDPICC plus Data readiness), a deal review that produces a forecast category, pilot and mutual-action-plan templates, a tiering model, a library of buying triggers and six land-and-expand motions.

To keep it practical, every template is filled in for one live Tier 1 account: Dennergo, a 132-site Mountain West fast-charging operator that just acquired a 22-site network and lost federal credit eligibility on 14 planned builds. Use Dennergo as the model for how good looks; replace its details with your own account's.

Key findings

What Garallen Company sells

A modular SaaS platform that designs, finances and operates EV-integrated charging sites: Garallen Plan (site and fleet techno-economic design with an analyst-reviewed, investor-grade report, usually within one business day), Garallen Operate (hub energy orchestration and cost minimization) and Garallen Flex (flexibility and demand-response revenue).

Sources: S1, S3

Who buys

Six segments: EPCs and engineering firms, charge point operators (CPOs), fleets and logistics, real estate owners, cities and transit agencies, and energy developers and financiers. Buyers span finance, fleet, network operations, asset management and sustainability.

Sources: S1, S4, S5, S6

Proof we can point to

An EPC partner engaged Garallen Company to re-evaluate 31 operating sites across CO, UT and AZ (Apr 2026); the company claims 18–24% upside on sites never systematically re-evaluated. Garallen Company also designed a 24-store convenience-retail rollout (2025).

Sources: S11, S12, S15

How it goes to market

Small and founder/CRO-led: a product-led entry (free Portfolio Screen for up to 15 sites, then $45 per site), partner-led deals with EPCs and consultancies, and event-sourced pipeline.

Sources: S2, S4, S13, S17

Why now

Federal credits for charging property (30C) and commercial EVs (45W) have ended for new projects, part of the federal charging program's unobligated funds has been redirected, and aging networks are shifting operators from expansion to optimization. The real competitor is the status quo: spreadsheets, consultants and charger-vendor designs.

Sources: S11, S19, S20

Part I

Foundations

What Garallen Company sells, to whom, and why now.

Section 01 · What Garallen Company sells, to whom, and how

Research Summary

Ground every conversation in facts. This section captures what Garallen Company actually sells, to whom and how, as of Oct 16, 2026, and tags each finding with its source and confidence. Sellers use the right-hand column; leadership validates anything not marked Sourced.

Founded, Denver, CO
2019
Employees (low confidence)
~22
Platform modules
3
Buyer segments
6
Analyst QA on standard reports
1 day
Diagram of the three Garallen Company modules, Plan, Operate and Flex, shown as a land-to-expand sequence with inputs and outputs for each.
Figure 1.1 · The Garallen Company platform: every deal lands on a design decision and expands into operations and flexibility revenue.

Findings and what they mean for sellers

#TopicFindingSales implicationSourceConfidence
1.1What Garallen Company sells"The decision platform for EV-integrated charging design, finance and operations": software to plan and run charging sites and depots, greenfield and brownfield.Sell decisions and outcomes (bankable investment cases, lower capex and energy cost, higher site returns), not "a modelling tool".S1Sourced
1.2Module 1 · Garallen PlanSite and fleet investment design: interconnection feasibility, storage sizing, EV-load modelling, capex/opex, IRR/NPV sensitivities, vehicle TCO, go/no-go. Inputs via Project, Fleet, Hub and Microgrid workspaces; output is an investor-grade report.The primary land product: every deal starts with a site, fleet or portfolio decision.S1, S3, S6Sourced
1.3Module 2 · Garallen OperateEnergy orchestration for charging hubs: real-time monitoring and control balancing EV load, storage, solar and feeder limits; continuous electricity-cost minimization with financial tracking.Recurring "operate" revenue on built sites; the expand motion after design.S1Sourced GA status: validate
1.4Module 3 · Garallen FlexAggregates batteries, on-site generation and flexible charging load for demand response, frequency services and wholesale or ancillary revenue.Late-stage expand; requires market and regulatory qualification per grid operator or utility.S1Sourced No launch found: validate
1.5Product namingThe Apr 2026 press release calls the core product "SiteLens"; the website says "Garallen Plan"; 2023–24 materials describe a "charging performance platform" with Design, Build and Run suites.Standardize naming in decks and CRM. Recommended: Garallen Company Platform → Plan / Operate / Flex; SiteLens = the Plan site workflow.S1, S11, S14Sourced Inconsistent
1.6Delivery modelOptimization runs in minutes; a Garallen Company analyst QA-reviews results, usually within one business day, before the report is published. Positions itself as an "embedded project partner, beyond traditional consultancy".A tech-enabled service: sell speed plus expert QA, and scope analyst capacity in every proposal.S3, S2Sourced
1.7Technical credentialsContainerized multi-cloud stack; BI-tool integration; multi-user with admin permissions; APIs for weather, telemetry, tariffs and regulation; deterministic optimization engine for reproducible, auditable results. Standards on request: GDPR, OCPP, OpenADR, lender bankability formats.Use for IT/security and lender due diligence; respect the "on customer request" qualifiers.S3, S6Sourced
1.8Security postureMulti-tenant with logical access controls; onboarding data anonymized; hosted on two major public clouds; OWASP Top Ten practices; references ISO privacy and IoT guidelines.Prepare a security questionnaire pack; claim no certification Security has not confirmed.S8Sourced Certifications: validate
1.9Value claims (company)Feasibility scenarios "6–8× faster and at lower cost"; "double-digit improvement in project returns"; on existing sites, "18–24% performance improvement" where sites were never systematically re-evaluated (CEO, Apr 2026).Approved proof points, but always pair them with a customer-specific model.S1, S11Sourced Vendor claim
1.10Segments / ICPEPCs and engineering firms; fleet owners (logistics, buses, rental and leasing, last-mile); CPOs; real estate owners and managers (REITs, C&I, mixed-use, multifamily, hospitality, self-storage); cities and municipalities; energy developers and financiers.Six segment plays (Sections 03, 10 and 12).S1, S4, S5, S6, S13Sourced
1.11Buyer personasCFOs and finance leads, fleet managers, charging-hub owners and managers, asset and portfolio managers, capital planning, operations, sustainability and compliance, municipal environmental analysts, EPC proposal teams.Persona discovery guides in Section 03.S4, S5, S6Sourced
1.12Reference customersAn EPC partner engaged Garallen Company for 31 operating sites in CO/UT/AZ (Apr 2026, on behalf of a CPO client); a 24-store convenience-retail EV program with a CPO and the same EPC (2025); earlier pilots with a transit agency, a rental-car franchisee, a retail REIT and a solar developer.Lead references: EPC/CPO brownfield and retail greenfield. Confirm reference permissions first.S11, S12, S15Sourced
1.13PartnersKeystone Ridge Electric (EPC and O&M, "ongoing partnership"); Tidewell Mobility Advisors (consultancy, Jun 2024); Brakeline Fleet Conversions (EV conversion, 2025); a state clean-energy accelerator and a cloud-provider startup program.The partner-led motion is real and proven: EPCs and consultancies buy or resell analysis for their end clients.S11, S12, S13, S17Sourced
1.14Public pricingPortfolio Screen for real estate: upload up to 15 addresses free (one account per company), no credit card; $45 per additional site; a top-level latent-value estimate per site. No other public pricing.A product-led entry for property owners; sellers convert ranked portfolios into paid designs.S4Sourced Other pricing: Assumption
1.15Sales org signalsCRO Owen Becker; Sales Manager Priya Raman (scheduling link on site); CEO Lena Marchetti active in deals and PR; three industry advisors (Marcus Hale, utilities; Doug Arnett, parcel and logistics fleets; Sana Qureshi, fleet telematics) staff events. About 20–25 employees and two sales staff; the careers page lists only engineering roles.A small founder-and-CRO team: the playbook must be lean. One AE runs the full cycle; advisors add executive and vertical credibility.S2, S1, S17, S18, S9Sourced Headcount: low
1.16Field marketingGA launch Mar 2024; trade-media webinar Oct 2024; 2025 US roadshow (10 cities); Charge Infrastructure Forum (Phoenix, 2025); PropTech Buildings Expo 2026 (Austin) targeting CPOs, EPCs, REITs and building managers.An event-driven pipeline cadence; the real estate expo signals a REIT/CRE motion.S10, S17Sourced
1.17Thought-leadership framework"Five disciplines" of charging economics: (1) rigorous upfront financial modelling, (2) data-driven utilization forecasting, (3) grid-aware smart charging, (4) living-plan re-optimization, (5) monetized sustainability (credits, RECs).Use as the discovery spine and the content for the Value Validation stage.S7Sourced
1.18Funding / stageFounded 2019 by Lena Marchetti and Tomas Reyes. Reported funding varies by source (about $3M to $6M), including state clean-energy grants and a climate-fund seed round.Position as a specialist, agile partner; expect vendor-viability diligence from enterprise buyers.S16, S13, S15Sourced Figures conflict
1.19US policy contextThe 30C refueling-property credit is unavailable for property placed in service after Jun 30, 2026; the 45W commercial clean-vehicle credit ended for vehicles acquired after Sep 30, 2025; federal charging-program funds continue through approved state plans, but part of the unobligated balance was transferred to other highway programs.Thinner subsidies make project economics tighter, so rigorous modelling and brownfield optimization are worth more. Re-model in-flight projects.S20Sourced Confirm with tax advisors
1.20Market contextRoughly 80,000 US public charging locations (federal station data, doubled since 2020); an aging installed base with rising failure rates; a site at 15% utilization can reach profitability with a 5-point utilization gain (industry analysis, as cited); markets maturing from expansion to optimization.Brownfield CPO optimization is a timely wedge.S11Sourced Secondary citations
1.21Competitors · fleet planningTelematics-led EV suitability tools; fleet-electrification planning startups; charging-management platforms with an assessment add-on.Differentiate on grid and energy co-optimization (storage, solar, microgrid), finance-grade outputs and the design-to-operate lifecycle.S19Sourced
1.22Competitors · energy design & opsMicrogrid and DER design software; charging- and energy-management platforms; DERMS and VPP platforms. Incumbents: spreadsheets, engineering consultants and charger vendors' "free" designs.The biggest competitor is the status quo. As Garallen Company's site puts it, decisions get "delegated to vendors".S1, S4, GKInferred
1.23Review sitesNo listing or reviews on the major software-review marketplaces.Build proof through case studies and references; consider a review program.S18Sourced Absence
1.24Likely revenue modelPer-site and per-project analysis fees (public $45/site at the screening tier), multi-user platform subscriptions, recurring Operate fees per hub, possible revenue share on Flex.Price-book placeholders in Sections 07 and 08; validate with RevOps.S4, S1Inferred

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Part II

The Sales Process

Eight stages, MEDDPICC-D and the end-to-end motion.

Section 02 · Eight stages, one definition of done

The Sales Process: Stage Overview

Eight stages adapted to a SaaS-plus-expert-QA motion. The classic enterprise "site walk" becomes Site Data Intake & Assessment: a virtual data-room review of tariffs, interval data, grid capacity, telematics and site layout, with a physical visit only when it is warranted.

Chevron diagram of the eight sales stages from Strategic Preparation to Close, with gate markers between stages and a bracket showing the stages compressed in partner-led deals.
Figure 2.1 · The eight-stage Garallen Company sales process with stage gates. Partner-led deals compress Stages 3–5.
  1. 1Strategic Preparation

    Objective
    Understand the account's sites, fleet or portfolio; EV program status; grid and tariff context; exposure to lost federal credits; and stakeholders. Form a point of view (POV) on where the value is.
    Work products
    Account brief; site/fleet snapshot (public charger locations, depots, properties); a three-hypothesis POV mapped to the five disciplines; persona outreach sequence.
    Exit criteria
    POV in CRM; ≥3 personas mapped; first meeting booked within 14 days.
    Manager actions
    Approve the POV for Tier 1; decide whether the CEO or an advisor should open the door.
    Coaching
    Lead with an insight about their sites (demand-charge exposure, underused locations, a lost 30C credit), not a feature list.
    Assessment questions
    Which sites or projects are most at risk financially? Who owns the investment decision? Is a partner (EPC) already engaged?
    Tools
    CRM (assumed); social-selling tool (assumed); federal station locator; utility tariff databases (GK); 10-K and ESG reports; Garallen Company Insights articles.
  2. 2First Meeting / Discovery

    Objective
    Validate pains, quantify impact, map the decision process and data availability; earn the demo.
    Work products
    Discovery notes in MEDDPICC-D format; pain→impact chain; data-availability checklist; agreed next step.
    Exit criteria
    Quantified pain ($ capex, $ energy and demand charges, utilization %, IRR gap, study cost/time); decision process and timeline; data owner named; demo booked.
    Manager actions
    Join Tier 1 calls; grade discovery; check that the finance pain (IRR, capex, opex) is quantified.
    Coaching
    Ask "what happens if this project is built on today's spreadsheet?" Explore all five disciplines; confirm a direct or partner path.
    Assessment questions
    What IRR or payback hurdle applies? What did the last study cost and how long did it take? Who supplies tariff, interval and telematics data?
    Tools
    Discovery guide (Section 03); scheduling link (sourced); five-discipline question bank.
  3. 3Demo / Solution Presentation

    Objective
    Show the platform answering their question: a scenario on their site or fleet, a sample investor-grade report and the design-to-operate roadmap.
    Work products
    Tailored demo (Project / Fleet / Hub / Microgrid workspaces); scenario comparison; sample report; Operate/Flex roadmap slide if relevant.
    Exit criteria
    Customer confirms ≥80% of decision criteria addressed; agrees to a pilot or assessment and to share data.
    Manager actions
    Ensure analyst support for technical buyers; rehearse the lender and finance angle for CFOs.
    Coaching
    Demo outcomes (IRR, capex avoided, demand-charge reduction), not screens. Run a sensitivity or what-if live.
    Assessment questions
    Did we show their numbers? Which stakeholder wasn't convinced? Did finance see the investor-grade output?
    Tools
    Demo tenant; sample reports (illustrative); BI dashboard views; launch demo recordings (S10).
  4. 4Trial / Pilot

    Objective
    Prove value fast and cheaply: free Portfolio Screen (≤15 sites), paid site assessment, brownfield performance review or a single-hub Operate pilot.
    Work products
    Pilot charter (Section 08); signed success criteria; data received; MAP v1 (Section 09).
    Exit criteria
    Charter signed; results delivered on time (one-business-day QA standard for standard reports); criteria met; agreement to a commercial proposal.
    Manager actions
    Approve scope, price and analyst capacity; refuse open-ended free work beyond the public free tier.
    Coaching
    Tie the pilot to a real decision: which sites to build or upgrade, which fleet phase.
    Assessment questions
    What decision does this pilot unlock? Who signs the follow-on? What is the budget source?
    Tools
    Portfolio Screen upload (S4); Garallen Plan; Operate sandbox (validate).
  5. 5Value Validation

    Objective
    Help the buyer adopt a best-practice operating model: the five disciplines, living-plan re-evaluation and monetized sustainability.
    Work products
    Five-discipline maturity readout; reference call (EPC brownfield or retail greenfield); operating model (who maintains the models and how often sites are re-evaluated).
    Exit criteria
    ≥1 reference or peer proof completed; buyer accepts an ongoing (subscription) model.
    Manager actions
    Broker references; bring in the advisor with vertical credibility (utility, logistics, telematics).
    Coaching
    Move the buyer from a one-off study to continuous optimization.
    Assessment questions
    Has the economic buyer heard a peer story? Do they accept re-evaluating sites annually or when tariffs change?
    Tools
    Insights articles (S7); case studies (S11, S12); reference list (validate permissions).
  6. 6Site Data Intake & Assessment

    Objective
    Collect and validate the data that drives model accuracy: tariffs, interval and billing data, grid capacity and interconnection status, site layout and rooftop, charger inventory and utilization, fleet telematics and routes.
    Work products
    Completed data-intake checklist; assumptions log; data-gap plan (Garallen Company API defaults vs customer data); optional site-visit notes.
    Exit criteria
    All critical inputs received or defaults approved by the customer; assumptions log signed.
    Manager actions
    Escalate data blockers; confirm analyst capacity and turnaround.
    Coaching
    Accuracy is the product. Document every assumption a lender or CFO will challenge.
    Assessment questions
    Which inputs are defaults and which are measured? Is the utility interconnection status known? Are NDAs needed?
    Tools
    Secure upload; data-room checklist (Section 08); telematics exports; utility bills.
  7. 7Pricing / Proposal

    Objective
    Deliver a value-based proposal with options (site pack, portfolio subscription, design plus Operate), an ROI case and terms.
    Work products
    Proposal; ROI business case (Section 07); SOW for analyst QA and deliverables; data and security terms; partner pricing if partner-led.
    Exit criteria
    Proposal presented live to the economic buyer; preferred option chosen; paper process mapped; verbal yes.
    Manager actions
    Deal review (Section 06); approve discounts against guardrails; align partner margin.
    Coaching
    Trade, don't discount: multi-site volume, term length, case-study rights, partner co-marketing.
    Assessment questions
    What does a wrong site decision cost compared with our fee? Who else is being considered (consultant, vendor, competitor)?
    Tools
    Price book (Assumption, validate); ROI model; order form and MSA templates.
  8. 8Close

    Objective
    Signed order, a smooth handoff to delivery and customer success, and an expansion plan already seeded.
    Work products
    Signed order form / MSA / DPA; kickoff; workspace set-up; handoff doc; expansion hypothesis (Operate, Flex, more sites).
    Exit criteria
    Booked; kickoff within 5 business days; first deliverable date agreed; case-study or reference consent requested.
    Manager actions
    CEO/CRO thank-you call (Tier 1); win/loss review; case-study ask.
    Coaching
    Close the mutual plan; avoid quarter-end discount pressure; set expansion trigger dates.
    Assessment questions
    Is everything promised in the SOW? When is the first value moment?
    Tools
    CRM; e-signature (assumed); onboarding checklist.

Stage-gate quick checklist

  • Stage 1 → 2: POV + ≥3 personas + path (direct or partner) in CRM
  • Stage 2 → 3: Quantified pain + decision process + data owner + demo booked
  • Stage 3 → 4: Criteria confirmed; customer agrees to share data and run a pilot or assessment
  • Stage 4 → 5: Signed pilot charter with a decision date (or a documented skip)
  • Stage 5 → 6: Reference or peer proof done; ongoing-model approach accepted
  • Stage 6 → 7: Data intake complete; assumptions log signed
  • Stage 7 → 8: Proposal presented live; verbal yes; paper process mapped
  • Closed: Booked; kickoff ≤5 business days; case-study consent requested

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Section 03 · Pipeline → qualification → discovery → demo → pilot → partners → executives

The End-to-End Sales Motion

This section turns the stages into daily work: where pipeline comes from, how to qualify it, how to run discovery by persona, how to demo and pilot, how to work with partners and executives, and how to spot a stalled deal before the forecast does.

3.1 Pipeline generation

PlayWhat good looks likeKey activitiesOwnersArtifacts · MetricsRed flags
Product-led: Portfolio ScreenEvery free 15-site upload gets a human follow-up within 2 business days with a ranked-portfolio readout.Monitor uploads; enrich the account; offer a 30-min results walkthrough; propose paid designs for the top sites.AE / Sales Manager; AnalystPortfolio Screen form (S4); CRM lead routing (assumed) · Upload→meeting %; upload→paid %Uploads with no follow-up; free tier abused by vendors
Partner-sourced (EPCs, consultancies, integrators)EPCs and consultancies use Garallen Company in their client proposals and register deals.Partner enablement; co-selling; per-project partner pricing; joint case studies.CRO / Partner leadDeal registration (assumed); partner price list (Assumption) · % pipeline partner-sourced; partner win ratePartner reselling without registration; channel conflict
Events & field marketingEach event yields booked meetings, not just badge scans.Pre-book meetings; advisor-staffed booths; 48-hour post-event follow-up; roadshow city meetups.CRO, AE, Advisors, MarketingEvent calendar (S10, S17) · Meetings per event; pipeline $ per eventNo pre-booked meetings
Outbound by triggerSequences fire on triggers (Section 11): new state awards, CPO acquisitions, depot announcements, REIT ESG commitments, tariff changes.Trigger monitoring; insight-led emails referencing the five disciplines; CEO and advisor intros.AESocial-selling tool; news alerts; Insights articles · Reply rate; meetings booked per weekGeneric "demo request" outreach
Content & inboundInsights and white papers convert to meetings.Gate key assets; webinar series with trade media.Marketing, AEInsights library (S7); white paper (S21) · Inbound MQL→SQL %Content with no CTA

3.2 Qualification: MEDDPICC-D

ElementWhat good looks likeKey activitiesOwnersArtifacts · MetricsRed flags
M · MetricsAgreed numeric outcomes: IRR uplift, capex avoided, demand-charge reduction, utilization %, study time and cost saved, tCO2e.Baseline from customer data; write targets into the pilot charter.AE + AnalystROI model (Section 07) · % opps with documented metrics"Better insight" without numbers
E · Economic BuyerMet the budget owner: CFO / VP Finance, Head of Fleet, VP Network Development (CPO), Head of Asset Management (REIT), EPC principal, city sustainability director or CFO.Executive meeting with CEO/CRO; confirm the budget source (opex software, project capex, grant).AE + CRO/CEOExec brief · EB met by Stage 4Only an analyst or engineer engaged by Stage 6
D · Decision CriteriaCriteria include accuracy and auditability, bankability (lender acceptance), speed, data security, integration (OCPP, OpenADR, BI), price and vendor viability.Shape criteria toward bankable, deterministic, design-to-operate.AE + SolutionsCriteria matrix · % criteria influencedLowest price only; "free design from the charger vendor" accepted
D · Decision ProcessSteps mapped: champion → technical validation → finance review → procurement / IT security → signature (or partner → end-client approval).Map in the MAP; find the security review early.AEMAP (Section 09) · Process documented by Stage 3Unknown approvers
P · Paper ProcessOrder form / MSA, DPA (GDPR), security questionnaire, insurance, public procurement rules (cities: RFP or cooperative purchasing), partner subcontract terms.Send standard docs at Stage 4; pre-fill the security pack.AE + COOMSA/DPA templates (validate); security pack (S8) · Days in legal/procurementPublic-sector RFP discovered at proposal
I · Identify PainPain tied to money and risk: missed ROI, demand-charge bills, underused or failed sites, grid-upgrade delays, slow or expensive studies, lost federal credits.Cost-of-inaction calculation; five-discipline diagnostic.AEFive disciplines (S7) · Pain quantified in $The pain is "curiosity"
C · ChampionAn internal advocate with access (Director of EV Infrastructure, Fleet Electrification Manager, Asset Manager).Champion tasks: share data, convene finance, arrange the EB meeting.AEChampion test log · Champion tested by Stage 3Champion can't get data or the EB
C · CompetitionKnown alternatives: spreadsheets and in-house teams, engineering consultants, charger-vendor designs, telematics-led suitability tools, fleet-planning startups, microgrid design software, charging- and energy-management vendors.Battlecards; trap-setting questions (grid co-optimization, bankability, brownfield re-evaluation).AE + CROBattlecards (to build) · Win rate by competitor"No competition" late in the cycle
D · Data readinessCustomer can provide required inputs within 2 weeks, or accepts API defaults with documented assumptions.Data checklist at Stage 2; assign a data owner.AE + AnalystData-intake checklist (Section 08) · Days to complete dataData owner unknown; NDA delays
Two-by-two matrix with problem fit on the horizontal axis and decision readiness on the vertical axis. Quadrants are Fast close, Education needed, Nurture and Disqualify for now, with the Dennergo opportunity plotted in Fast close.
Figure 3.1 · Qualification matrix: plot every open opportunity by problem fit and readiness to decide.

Reading the matrix

  • Fast close (strong fit, ready to decide): run the MAP, book the deal review, protect analyst capacity.
  • Education needed (ready, fit unproven): lead with the five-discipline diagnostic and a peer story to prove the problem is worth solving.
  • Nurture (strong fit, not ready): set a trigger watch (Section 11) and offer the Portfolio Screen or a partner referral. Don't spend analyst time yet.
  • Disqualify for now (weak fit, not ready): close-lost with a trigger watch.

3.3 Discovery by persona

PersonaWhat they knowAsk aboutOwnerArtifact · MetricRed flag
CPO · VP Network / Head of OperationsUtilization by site, demand-charge exposure, failures and downtime, expansion vs optimization plans.Utilization distribution; worst-10 sites; $ demand charges; battery plans; pricing strategy; grid-upgrade queue.AEDiscovery guide · Discovery score ≥4/5No site-level data
Fleet · Head of Fleet / Fleet Electrification ManagerFleet mix, duty cycles, replacement cycle, depot power, TCO targets.Vehicles by type; routes and dwell; replacement schedule; depot capacity; impact of losing 45W; retrofit or conversion interest.AE (+ telematics advisor)Fleet workspace inputs · Vehicles and depots in scopePilot EVs bought before an infrastructure plan
Real estate · Asset/Portfolio Manager, Capital PlanningNOI uplift, tenant retention, capex discipline, compliance with tenant and regulatory electrification demands.Properties by type; parking and rooftop availability; NOI targets; tenant EV requests; ESG commitments; existing EV, solar or storage.AEPortfolio Screen · Sites uploaded"Vendors will install for free" mindset
EPC / professional services · Principal, Proposal or Engineering LeadNeeds faster, bankable proposals and differentiated bids.Bids per year; hours per feasibility study; win rate; client financing requirements; O&M offering.AE / Partner leadPartner pricing · Projects per yearSees Garallen Company as a competitor to its consulting
CFO / financier / energy developerNeeds IRR/NPV, sensitivities, bankable report acceptance and risk.Hurdle rate; lender requirements and bankability standard; cost of capital; deal pipeline size.AE + CEOSample investor-grade report · Lender requirements capturedFinance not engaged
City / municipality · Sustainability, Transit, FleetNeeds emissions baselines, funding applications, stakeholder alignment and policy compliance.Climate targets; grant deadlines; transit and municipal fleet size; public charging plans; procurement route.AE (+ utility advisor)Cities workflow (S6) · Grant deadline capturedNo procurement path

3.4 Demo, pilot, partners and executives

ElementWhat good looks likeKey activitiesOwnersArtifacts · MetricsRed flags
Demo
Tailored scenario demoUses the customer's site or fleet (or a close proxy) and answers their decision question live with what-if scenarios.Pre-call with the champion; prepare the scenario; show the investor-grade report and sensitivity; close on a pilot.AE + AnalystDemo tenant; sample reports · Demo→pilot %Generic tour; no next step
Pilot
Pilot with MAPCharter with success criteria, data plan, decision date and commercial next step.Charter → data intake → model run → one-day QA → readout → proposal.AE + Analyst + ChampionSections 08 & 09 · Pilot→win %Free, open-ended analysis
Partner engagement
EPCs & installers (e.g., Keystone Ridge Electric)Garallen Company embedded in the EPC's feasibility and upgrade offerings.Partner onboarding; per-project pricing; co-branded reports (validate); joint pursuit of CPO and retail portfolios.CRO / Partner leadPartner playbook · Partner projects per quarterPartner withholds end-client access
Consultancies (e.g., Tidewell Mobility Advisors)Consultants deliver strategy; Garallen Company powers the analytics.Joint offers (free diagnostic → roadmap); referral and resale terms.CROReferral agreement (assumed) · Referrals per quarterOverlapping scopes
EV conversion, hardware & logistics partners (e.g., Brakeline)Joint fleet-electrification packages.Bundle analysis with conversion and charging offers while keeping the modelling vendor-neutral.CRO, AEJoint pitch · Joint opportunitiesPerceived loss of neutrality
CPOs & site hosts as channelSite host + CPO + EPC + Garallen Company as the design layer (the retail-rollout model).Map all parties early; agree who pays (EPC, host or CPO).AEStakeholder map · Multi-party deals closedUnclear payer
Executive alignment
CEO / CRO / advisor sponsorshipEvery Tier 1 deal has an exec sponsor; vertical advisors join key meetings (utilities: Marcus Hale; logistics: Doug Arnett; fleet telematics: Sana Qureshi).Exec-to-exec call at Stage 2–3 and before the proposal; an advisory-board-style session for strategic accounts.CEO, CRO, AdvisorsExec brief template · Exec touches per Tier 1Executives appear only at escalation

3.5 Champion test

Real champion

Sells for you when you're not in the room

  • Information: shares the pain, the politics, the competition and the hurdles
  • Access: introduces you to the EB, finance and IT, and answers by text
  • Credibility: has delivered a capital project before; others trust their judgement
  • Personal win: their metrics (uptime, NOI, fleet TCO) improve if you win

Coach, not champion

Friendly, but cannot move the deal

  • Gatekeeper: everything must go through them; restricts information
  • Low credibility: process keeps changing; overpromises; no-shows
  • No stake: "loves the demo" with no outcome they own
  • Friend zone: "a colleague might be interested"

3.6 Stalled-deal indicators and recovery

Leading indicators · review weekly

Triage any stall within 7 days

  • No customer action in 14 days
  • Data not delivered within 2 weeks
  • EB not met by Stage 5
  • Pilot running without a decision date
  • "Waiting on grants or policy"
  • Partner went silent
  • Security review not started 30 days before close
  • Champion left the company
  • Owners: AE + CRO · Tools: MAP, CRM stage aging · Metric: stage age vs benchmark

Stalled-deal recovery playbook

  • Re-quantify the cost of inaction with a fresh scenario (post-30C economics, a new tariff)
  • Offer a smaller decision: a 3-site assessment or a single-site upgrade case
  • Go exec-to-exec (CEO, CRO or the relevant advisor)
  • Unblock data: accept API defaults with documented assumptions
  • No movement in 30 days: downgrade the forecast and nurture with trigger alerts

Stall signal → likely cause → first move

SignalMost likely causeFirst recovery moveOwner · within
No customer action in 14 daysThe decision question was never agreed; the deal is "interesting", not urgentRe-send the one-page decision question with a cost-of-delay number; ask the champion to confirm or kill itAE · 2 days
Data not delivered within 2 weeksData owner unnamed, or IT has not cleared the NDA/DPAOffer API defaults with documented assumptions; book 30 minutes with the data owner and IT togetherAE + Analyst · 3 days
EB not met by Stage 5Champion lacks access, or is protecting the projectRun the champion test again; propose an exec-to-exec note the champion can forwardAE + CRO · 5 days
Pilot running without a decision dateCharter signed without a dated go/no-goRe-issue the charter with a readout date and the decision it will triggerAE · 2 days
"Waiting on grants or policy"The business case only works with incentivesRe-model incentive-neutral; show the sites that pencil without creditsAnalyst · 5 days
Security review not started 30 days outPaper process not mapped in the MAPSend the standard security pack pre-filled; name the reviewer in the MAPAE + COO · 3 days
Champion left the companySingle-threaded dealRe-open with the EB using the readout; identify a new champion from the committee mapAE + CRO · 7 days

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Part III

Plan & Prioritize

Territories and a fully worked Tier 1 account plan.

Section 04 · Where to hunt, in what order, with what capacity

Territory Planning

With a small team, territories are best cut by segment and region (for example: Mountain West and California CPO/retail; national REIT/CRE; fleets and logistics; Canada). Targets below are illustrative assumptions. Calibrate them to quota and to capacity, including analyst QA capacity, which is the real constraint on how many pilots can run at once.

StepActivityData sourcesOutputCadenceTarget (illustrative)
1 · ResearchBuild the universe per segment: CPOs (by site count), EPCs and installers, REITs and multi-site owners, fleets of 50+ vehicles, cities and transit agencies, energy developers and financiers.Federal station data; REIT lists; fleet databases; state funding award lists; trade-show attendee lists; professional networksAccount universe by segment and regionAnnual + quarterly100% of accounts segmented
2 · Market priorityPrioritize regions with high charger density, aging networks, high demand charges and active incentives (Mountain West and California first, per S11).Station data; utility tariffs; reliability studies; state programsRegion heat mapSemi-annualTop-5 regions defined
3 · WhitespaceFor each account: sites and depots not yet analyzed; modules not owned (Plan, Operate, Flex).CRM; customer workspacesWhitespace matrixQuarterlyWhitespace ≥4× quota
4 · TieringApply the Section 10 model.Steps 1–3Tier listAnnual + on triggerTier 1 ≤10 accounts per AE
5 · Partner mapAssign EPCs, consultancies and hardware partners by region and segment.Partner listPartner coverage mapSemi-annual≥2 active partners in each top region
6 · Activity planWeekly activity standards.CRMActivity targetsWeeklySee activity standard below
7 · Pipeline mathQuota ÷ win rate ÷ ACV; cycle length by segment (partner per-project 2–6 wks; CPO/REIT portfolio 1–4 mo; fleet/city 3–9 mo, Assumption).CRM historyPipeline targetQuarterlyCoverage ≥3×
8 · Capacity checkMatch booked pilots and projects to analyst QA capacity (one-business-day standard).Delivery calendarCapacity planBi-weeklyNo pilot starts without a capacity slot
9 · ReviewTerritory QBR.All of the aboveQBR deckQuarterlyPlan vs actual; mix of projects, subscriptions and Operate
Heat map table scoring seven US regions on charger density, aging network, demand charges, active incentives and partner coverage, with totals; California, Mountain West, Northeast, Pacific Northwest and Texas form the top five.
Figure 4.1 · Region heat map (illustrative scores, 1 = weak, 5 = strong). The top five regions get named partners and Tier 1 coverage first.
Funnel showing an annual quota of 900 thousand dollars, an average first-year contract value of 60 thousand dollars, 15 wins needed, a 28 percent win rate and 54 qualified opportunities per year.
Figure 4.2 · Pipeline math for one AE (illustrative).

Territory plan deliverables

  • Segment universe and tiers
  • Region heat map
  • Top-25 focus list with live triggers
  • Partner coverage map
  • Pipeline math and capacity plan

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Section 05 · The template, filled in for a live Tier 1 account

Account Plan: Dennergo

Required for Tier 1 (all sections) and Tier 2 (sections A–F). Keep it to two pages and update it in the CRM. The right-hand example column is the live plan for Dennergo; use it as the standard for depth.

DennergoTier 1 · Score 87 · Motion C

Segment
Regional charge point operator (CPO)
HQ
Salt Lake City, UT · ~210 employees · founded 2017
Footprint
132 DC fast-charging sites (586 ports, 150–350 kW) in UT, CO, AZ, NV, NM + 40 Level 2 destination sites
Ownership
Backed by an infrastructure fund (Ridgeline Infrastructure Partners); board approves capex over $250K
Budget cycle
Calendar FY; FY27 budget locks mid-December; monthly capex committee
Live triggers
Acquired the 22-site Sagebrush Fastcharge network (Aug 2026) · 14 planned builds lost 30C eligibility · new CFO (Jul 2026) · utility rate case filed (Sep 2026)
SectionFieldWhat to captureDennergo example (illustrative)OwnerUpdate
A. Account overviewProfileSegment, HQ, regions, number of sites / depots / properties, EV program stage, budget cycle.Regional CPO: 132 DCFC sites in 5 Mountain West states (+22 acquired); FY = calendar year; budget locks mid-December.AEAnnual
Strategic prioritiesGrowth vs optimization; ESG targets; funding dependencies.Shift from expansion to optimizing aging sites; integrate the Sagebrush network; 14 2H-2026 builds lost 30C eligibility.AEAnnual
B. Asset footprintSites / fleet / portfolioCount, types, chargers (kW), utilization, storage/solar, grid constraints; fleet by vehicle type.Network utilization 11%; 41 sites under 8%; 17 sites where demand charges exceed 40% of the energy bill; 9 sites reach end of hardware warranty in 2027.AE + AnalystSemi-annual
Garallen Company coverageSites analyzed, modules used, workspaces and users, Operate-connected hubs.31 sites analyzed with Plan (via Keystone Ridge Electric, Apr 2026); 0 on Operate; 2 users.CS / AEQuarterly
C. Relationship mapBuying committeeEB, champion, technical, finance, procurement/IT, blockers; sentiment.VP Network Development Daniel Okafor (EB); Director Site Operations Rachel Lindqvist (champion); CFO Martin Shaw (approver). See Figure 5.1.AEMonthly
EcosystemEPCs, site hosts, utilities, financiers, hardware vendors.EPC partner: Keystone Ridge Electric; utility: a Mountain West investor-owned utility; fund owner and an infrastructure lender.AEQuarterly
D. Opportunity mapActive & plannedOpportunity, module, sites, $, stage, close date, path (direct or partner).Upgrade design pack + Operate pilot, 18 sites, $96.0K (Stage 4, Jan 29); pipeline re-model, 14 sites, $33.6K (Stage 3, Dec 18); Sagebrush screen, 22 sites, $26.4K (Stage 2, Dec 18).AEWeekly
WhitespaceRemaining sites, new regions, Operate/Flex, more users and teams.123 sites not yet analyzed (incl. 22 acquired); Operate on 17 high-demand-charge sites; Flex eligibility on 9 sites with planned storage (validate).AEQuarterly
E. Value hypothesesTop 3, quantifiedQuantified (Section 07).H1 +6% revenue on 18 bottom-quartile sites ($227K/yr; conservative vs the 18–24% vendor claim). H2 −15% demand charges ($140K/yr). H3 $330K capex avoided by redesigning 2 of 14 pipeline builds.AE + AnalystQuarterly
F. Competitive positionAlternativesIncumbent tools, consultants, vendor designs; competitors.In-house spreadsheet model + a regional engineering firm (~$8K and 6–8 weeks per study); evaluating a charging-management platform's assessment add-on.AEQuarterly
G. StrategyLand / expand motionPick from Section 12.Motion C: brownfield review → upgrade designs → Operate → Flex.AE + CROQuarterly
Exec alignmentExec sponsor and advisor; meeting plan.CEO Lena Marchetti ↔ CEO Teresa Valdez; CRO Owen Becker ↔ CFO Martin Shaw; advisor Marcus Hale on interconnection strategy.CROSemi-annual
H. 90-day actionsAction / owner / dateConcrete next steps.31-site readout (Oct 30); CEO-to-CEO call (Nov 10); MAP kickoff (Nov 19); Operate pilot charter (Dec 4). Full list below.AEBi-weekly
I. Risks & asksRisks; resource needsAnalyst capacity, data access, policy shifts, vendor-viability concerns.Need 2 analyst-weeks Nov–Dec; security questionnaire; Sagebrush interval data missing on 9 sites; possible fund-level capex freeze until the Q1 board.AEMonthly
J. KPIsAccount KPIsARR/bookings, sites analyzed, modules adopted, realized savings, NPS, reference status.Sites analyzed 31 → 71 (Q1 2027) → 154 (Q4 2027); first Operate hub live Apr 2027; reference-ready by Q3 2027.AE / CSQuarterly
Stakeholder map for Dennergo showing the CEO and CFO at the top, the VP Network Development as economic buyer, the Director of Site Operations as champion, and technical, pricing, IT security and procurement roles below, with external partners, utility, fund owner and lender around the edge, each colour-coded by sentiment.
Figure 5.1 · Dennergo buying committee and ecosystem. Colour shows sentiment; ring weight shows influence on the decision.
StakeholderRole in decisionSentimentInfluenceWhat they need to hear · our next move
Teresa Valdez, CEOExecutive sponsor (target)NeutralHighIntegration of Sagebrush without new capex risk. CEO-to-CEO call Nov 10 with a one-page POV.
Martin Shaw, CFO (new, Jul 2026)Approver; owns hurdle rateUnknownHighBoard-ready IRR on the 14 pipeline builds after losing 30C. CRO intro via champion; send a sample investor-grade report.
Daniel Okafor, VP Network DevelopmentEconomic buyerSupporterHighWhich sites to upgrade, which to sell or retire. Readout Oct 30; confirm budget source (opex vs project capex).
Rachel Lindqvist, Director Site OperationsChampionChampionMed-HighFewer failing sites and demand-charge surprises. Champion test passed 4/4 (Oct 9).
Kevin Tran, Energy & Grid ManagerTechnical evaluator; data ownerSupporterMediumAuditable tariff and storage models. Owns interval data; data request Nov 6.
Jamal Pierce, Head of Pricing & RevenueInfluencerNeutralMediumPricing scenarios per site. Include pricing what-ifs in the demo.
Alicia Moreno, Head of IT & SecuritySecurity review; potential blockerSkepticMediumData handling, access control, certifications. Send security pack Dec 1; no unconfirmed claims.
Nora Fitzgerald, Procurement ManagerPaper processNeutralLow-MedStandard MSA/DPA and vendor onboarding. Send templates at Stage 4.
Sam Delgado, PM, Keystone Ridge ElectricPartner (EPC/O&M)SupporterMediumUpgrade work for his crews. Agree who contracts and partner margin by Nov 19.

90-day action plan

DateActionOwnerStatus
Oct 30Readout of the 31-site analysis to Okafor and Lindqvist; agree the 18-site upgrade scopeAE + Analyst leadScheduled
Nov 6Data request: 18 upgrade sites + 22 Sagebrush sites (tariffs, 12 months of interval data, sessions)AE; Tran (customer)Planned
Nov 10CEO-to-CEO call: integration POV and post-30C pipeline riskMarchetti ↔ ValdezPlanned
Nov 19MAP kickoff; partner roles and margin agreed with Keystone RidgeAE; Lindqvist; DelgadoPlanned
Dec 1Security pack and standard MSA/DPA sentCOO; Moreno; FitzgeraldPlanned
Dec 4Operate pilot charter signed for the St. George hubAE; LindqvistPlanned
Dec 18Pipeline re-model and Sagebrush screen delivered; CFO previewAnalyst lead; ShawPlanned
Jan 12Readout with EB and CFO; proposal options presentedAE + CEOPlanned

Account plan quality check

  • Asset footprint quantified
  • EB identified and met
  • ≥3 quantified hypotheses
  • Whitespace sized
  • 90-day plan with owners
  • Exec sponsor and advisor named (Tier 1)

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Part IV

Win the Deal

Deal review, business case, pilots and the mutual action plan.

Section 06 · Twenty minutes that decide the forecast

Opportunity & Deal Review

Run a review for every opportunity of $25K or more in first-year value (illustrative threshold), every Tier 1 deal, and before anything moves to Commit. Twenty minutes: the AE presents, the CRO challenges, the analyst lead joins for scope and capacity.

Bar showing forecast bands: 0 to 9 Pipeline, 10 to 13 Best Case, 14 to 18 Commit, with the Dennergo deal marked at 12.
Horizontal bar scorecard of the nine MEDDPICC-D elements for the Dennergo deal: Metrics 2, Economic buyer 1, Decision criteria 2, Decision process 1, Paper process 0, Pain 2, Champion 2, Competition 1, Data readiness 1, total 12 of 18.
Figure 6.1 · Live example: Dennergo upgrade design pack scores 12/18 (Best Case).
Review areaQuestionEvidence requiredRed flagNext-action owner
MetricsWhat numeric outcome did the customer agree to?Pilot charter or email with baseline and target"Insight" with no numberAE + Analyst
Economic BuyerWho signs, and have we met them?Meeting notes; budget sourceOnly analyst-level contactAE + CRO/CEO
Decision CriteriaTop 5 criteria, and our rank against the alternatives?Criteria matrix validated by the championPrice-only; benchmark is a free vendor designAE
Decision ProcessSteps and dates to signature (including partner or end client)?MAP with customer datesUnknown approversAE
Paper ProcessMSA / DPA / security questionnaire / procurement route?Docs sent; reviewer namedPublic RFP surprise; security not startedAE + COO
Identify PainWhat does inaction cost?Quantified $ (capex, opex, IRR gap)Pain not owned by the EBAE
ChampionWhat has the champion done for us?Champion action logChampion lacks accessAE
CompetitionAlternatives, including spreadsheets, consultants and vendor designs?Competitive notes"No competition"AE
Data ReadinessIs data in hand, or are defaults approved?Data checklist statusData more than 2 weeks lateAE + Analyst
Scope & CapacityIs the SOW clear and analyst capacity booked?SOW; delivery calendarCustom work not pricedAnalyst lead / COO
Product FitDoes the deal need Operate/Flex capabilities or integrations that are not GA?Product sign-offRoadmap sellingCRO + R&D lead
Partner DynamicsIf partner-led: who pays, who owns the end client, what margin?Partner agreement / registrationUnclear payer; channel conflictCRO
CommercialsDiscount against guardrails; what did we get in trade (term, sites, case study)?Pricing approvalUnilateral discountCRO
ForecastAre category and date justified?Score; MAP progressClose date slipped twice or moreCRO

Dennergo review · Oct 21, 2026

Top 3 risks and mitigations

  • CFO not engaged (E=1): CRO-to-CFO intro via Lindqvist; send sample investor-grade report. Owner: Becker · Nov 13
  • Security not started (P=0): send the security pack and MSA/DPA early. Owner: COO · Dec 1
  • Sagebrush data gaps (D=1): approve API defaults for 9 sites, documented in the assumptions log. Owner: Analyst lead · Nov 20

Deal review outputs

  • Updated MEDDPICC-D score
  • Top 3 risks with mitigation owner and date
  • Forecast category
  • Resource asks (executive, analyst, legal)
  • Next review date

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Section 07 · Two business cases, one story

Business Case, ROI & TCO

Two business cases matter: the customer's project case (IRR, NPV and TCO of the site or fleet), which Garallen Company produces, and the case for buying it: better, faster decisions versus the fee. Sellers own the second and use the first as proof.

Value leverMetricCalculation / methodTypical inputsGarallen Company proof point / capabilitySource · confidence
Study speed & costWeeks saved; $ consultant cost avoided(Hours per study × loaded rate, or consultant fee) − Garallen Company fee; cycle time before and afterStudies per year; current cost per studyScenarios "6–8× faster and at lower cost"; results in minutes + QA in about one business dayS1, S3 · vendor claim
Capex avoided (right-sizing)$ capexOverbuilt chargers, storage or grid upgrades avoided vs the baseline designBaseline design; equipment quotesInterconnection feasibility, storage and hub sizing; "avoid overbuilding and misplaced capex"S1, S4
Site-selection qualityPortfolio NPV; sites rejectedΣ NPV of selected sites vs naive selection; losses avoided on rejected sitesCandidate sites, traffic, competitionPortfolio Screen; the 24-store retail program evaluationS4, S12
Utilization / revenueRevenue uplift %Δ sessions × price; optimal pricing scenariosSession data; pricingUtilization forecasting; pricing optimization; 18–24% on re-evaluated sites (company claim)S5, S7, S11
Energy & demand charges$ opex reductionDemand-charge reduction from smart charging, storage, solar; time-of-use shiftingInterval data; tariffsPlan tariff/storage/solar modelling; Operate continuous cost minimizationS1, S7
Grid-upgrade timingMonths saved; $ upgrade avoidedCompare grid upgrade vs microgrid vs managed-charging scenariosUtility capacity; quotes"Integrate with the grid, request an upgrade, or build an EV-integrated grid" decisionS5, S6
Fleet TCO$/mile; TCO delta ICE vs EVVehicle + energy + maintenance + infrastructure over the horizonFleet data; duty cyclesFleet workspace: optimal fleet size, schedule, vehicle TCOS3, S5
Financing / bankabilityTime to financial close; cost of capitalFaster lender approval; lower risk premium (qualitative unless the lender confirms)Lender requirementsInvestor-grade report; bankability formats on request; deterministic, auditable engineS3
Flexibility revenue$ per kW-yrDemand-response, ancillary and wholesale revenue from aggregated storage and EV loadGrid operator / utility program rulesGarallen FlexS1 · validate availability
Sustainability monetization$ credits; tCO2eCarbon credits, RECs and clean-fuel-standard credits embedded in the modelEnergy mix; program rules"Monetized sustainability" discipline; automated carbon calculationsS7, S14, GK
Risk reductionDownside IRR (P90)Sensitivity on tariffs, utilization, interest rates, incentivesAssumption rangesScenario-comparison engine; sensitivity analysisS3, S14
Ongoing re-optimizationAnnual value of a model refreshValue of decisions after tariff, policy or hardware changes, without new consultingChange events per year"Living plan" re-optimization; continuously updated dataS7, S5

Worked example: Dennergo, 18 bottom-quartile DCFC sites

Illustrative. Replace with the customer's data; the Garallen Company fee is a placeholder until the price book is confirmed.

#Assumption / inputValueNote
1Sites in scope18 operating DCFC sitesBrownfield optimization
2Avg charging revenue per site$210,000 / yrCustomer data
3Revenue uplift (re-sizing, pricing, ops)6% → $226,800 / yrConservative vs the 18–24% claim
4Avg demand charges per site$52,000 / yrFrom bills and interval data
5Demand-charge reduction15% → $140,400 / yrValidate per tariff
6Capex avoided2 builds × $165,000 = $330,000One-time; redesigned pipeline sites
7Consultant studies avoided18 × $8,000 = $144,000One-time; plus 6–8 weeks saved
8Year-1 gross benefit$841,2003 + 5 + 6 + 7
9Recurring annual benefit$367,200 / yr3 + 5
10Garallen Company fee (placeholder)$96,000 year 1Validate with the price book
11Year-1 ROI≈ 7.8×(8 − 10) ÷ 10
12Not monetizedFinancing speed, Flex revenue, carbon creditsAdd if the customer can quantify
Waterfall chart: revenue uplift 226.8 thousand, demand-charge savings 140.4 thousand, capex avoided 330 thousand and studies avoided 144 thousand sum to 841.2 thousand gross benefit; the 96 thousand fee leaves 745.2 thousand net.
Figure 7.1 · Year-1 benefit build vs fee ($K, illustrative).
Bar chart of year-one ROI: downside 4.2 times, base 7.8 times, upside 11.7 times.
Figure 7.2 · Downside, base and upside cases (Year-1 ROI).

Sensitivity: always show the downside

CaseRevenue upliftDemand-charge cutCapex avoidedStudies avoidedYear-1 grossYear-1 ROI
Downside (P90)3% · $113,4008% · $74,8801 build · $165,000$144,000$497,2804.2×
Base6% · $226,80015% · $140,4002 builds · $330,000$144,000$841,2007.8×
Upside10% · $378,00022% · $205,9203 builds · $495,000$144,000$1,222,92011.7×

Business case checklist

  • Use customer data where possible; label every default
  • Customer validated rates, utilization and hurdle rate
  • Incentive assumptions reflect current law (30C / 45W / federal program status)
  • Show the downside (sensitivity) case
  • Separate one-time from recurring benefits
  • Champion and finance have acknowledged the case

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Section 08 · Prove value fast, cheaply and toward a decision

Pilot Setup & Checklists

Default policy: free only within the public Portfolio Screen tier (≤15 sites). Every other pilot is paid, or credited against a follow-on order (policy is an Assumption; validate). Standard deliverable SLA: results QA-reviewed within about one business day of complete data (S3).

Pilot typeWhen to useScope & durationSuccess criteria (examples)Customer commitmentsGarallen Company resourcesExit to commercial
Portfolio Screen (self-serve)REITs, property owners and multi-site retailers exploring EV, solar or storage≤15 addresses; same day to a few days; $45 per additional siteRanked list with latent-value estimates; ≥3 sites worth deeper designUpload a spreadsheet; 30-min readoutAutomated + AE readoutPaid Plan designs for top sites; portfolio subscription
Paid greenfield site assessmentCPO, EPC or retailer deciding where and what to build1–5 sites; 1–3 weeksInvestor-grade report per site; go/no-go; IRR/NPV ranges accepted by financeSite data, tariffs, budget owner at the readoutAnalyst QA; AEMulti-site pack or subscription
Brownfield performance reviewCPOs with aging or underperforming sites (EPC-partner model)10–40 sites; 3–8 weeksSites ranked by upside; upgrade designs (chargers, storage, ops); quantified upliftUtilization and session data, bills, charger inventoryAnalyst team; CEO/CRO readoutUpgrade designs + Operate on upgraded sites
Fleet transition studyFleets planning ICE→EV for a depot or region1 depot or fleet segment; 2–6 weeksOptimal fleet mix and schedule; depot charging and grid plan; TCOTelematics and route data, vehicle list, depot electrical infoAnalyst; telematics advisorMulti-depot rollout; Operate at the depot
City / transit planning studyMunicipalities needing funding-ready plansProgram level; 4–8 weeksEmissions baseline and reduction; funding-application-ready financialsFleet and site data; procurement pathAnalyst; utility advisorPlatform access for departments; ongoing reporting
EPC partner trialEPCs and consultants evaluating Garallen Company for bids2–3 live bids; 30–60 daysProposal time down; win rate; client acceptance of the reportReal bids; partner agreementPartner lead; analystPartner subscription or per-project agreement
Operate single-hub pilotA built hub with storage/solar or demand-charge issues1 hub; 60–90 daysElectricity cost down vs baseline; uptime; data integration (OCPP / SCADA)Network / SCADA access; site operatorR&D integration engineer (validate GA status)Operate subscription across hubs
Flex eligibility assessmentPortfolios with storage or flexible load in active marketsPortfolio; 2–4 weeksEligible MW; projected $/kW-yr; program pathwayAsset list; interconnection detailsAnalyst; utility advisorFlex enrollment (validate availability)

Pilot charter · Dennergo brownfield performance review

Decision question
Which of the 18 bottom-quartile sites should Dennergo upgrade, re-price or retire in FY27, and in what order?
Scope
18 operating DCFC sites (UT, CO, AZ); 4 weeks; Plan brownfield workflow + analyst QA
Success criteria
Sites ranked by upside; ≥12 sites with a positive upgrade case at Dennergo's 11% hurdle; modelled uplift within ±10% of actuals on 3 back-tested sites
Data
12 months of tariffs and interval data, sessions, charger inventory; owner: Kevin Tran; due Dec 11
Decision maker / date
Daniel Okafor (EB) with Martin Shaw (CFO) · readout Jan 12, 2027
Commercial next step
Upgrade design pack + Operate pilot (Section 07 options), signature target Jan 29, 2027
Price
$9,600, credited in full against an order signed by Jan 29, 2027

Six pilot success factors

If one is missing, it's a free consulting project

  • Skin in the game: paid, or credited, with customer time committed
  • Defined, measurable criteria signed before kickoff
  • The right players: EB and finance at the readout
  • Approvals in place: NDA/DPA and IT access before data moves
  • Timeline: kickoff, mid-point and readout dates on the MAP
  • Agreed next step if the criteria are met

Pilot setup and data-intake checklist

  • Charter signed: decision question, scope, success criteria, decision date, decision maker, commercial next step
  • NDA/DPA in place if customer data is sensitive (GDPR and anonymization, S8)
  • Data received: tariffs and bills (12 months), interval data, charger inventory and sessions, site layout / parking / rooftop, grid capacity and interconnection status, fleet telematics and routes, financial assumptions (rates, hurdle)
  • Assumptions log created; API defaults approved by the customer
  • Analyst capacity slot booked; QA SLA communicated
  • Mid-point check-in; final readout with the EB and finance
  • Readout deck: results vs criteria, $ impact, recommendation, proposal
  • Case-study and reference consent requested at the readout

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Section 09 · One shared plan from kickoff to the 90-day value review

Mutual Action Plan

Shared with the customer, and with the partner where relevant. The example is Dennergo's brownfield review → upgrade designs → Operate path. Dates are relative to target signature (T = Fri Jan 29, 2027), with calendar dates for this account. Partner-led deals add an end-client approval milestone.

PhaseMilestoneCustomer ownerGarallen Company ownerPartner ownerTarget · dateExit evidence
AlignKickoff: decision question, success criteria, timelineRachel Lindqvist (champion)AEKeystone Ridge PMT−10 wks · Nov 19MAP v1 agreed
AlignExecutive alignment callDaniel Okafor (EB)CEO / CRO—T−9 wks · Dec 1EB confirms priority and budget
DataData request and NDA/DPAKevin Tran; LegalAE + AnalystKeystone RidgeT−9 → T−7 wks · Dec 1–11Data checklist complete
ProvePilot / assessment run + QAChampionAnalyst lead—T−7 → T−4 wks · Dec 14–Jan 8Results delivered
ProveReadout with EB and financeOkafor, ShawAE + Analyst + CEOKeystone RidgeT−4 wks · Jan 12Agreement on value and next step
ValidateReference callOkaforAE—T−4 wks · Jan 14Reference completed
ProposeProposal and ROI review (site pack / subscription / Operate)Okafor; FinanceAEPartner pricingT−3 wks · Jan 19Preferred option chosen
DecideSecurity questionnaire and procurementMoreno; FitzgeraldCOO / AE—T−3 → T−1 wks · Jan 11–27Security approved
DecideLegal (MSA / DPA / order form)LegalCOO—T−2 wks → T · Jan 18–29Redlines closed
DecideSignatureOkafor (EB)AE—T · Jan 29Signed order
DeliverOnboarding: workspace, users, data connectionsChampionCS / AnalystKeystone RidgeT+1 wk · Feb 5Users active
DeliverFirst deliverable: upgrade designsChampionAnalystKeystone RidgeT+2 → T+6 wks · Feb 12–Mar 12Designs accepted
OperateOperate go-live on the first upgraded hubSite OpsR&D integrationKeystone Ridge O&MPer plan · Apr 2027Hub live; baseline set
Expand90-day value review and expansion planOkaforAE / CEO—T+90 days · Apr 29Value report; next sites and modules
Gantt chart of fourteen milestones across nine phases (Align, Data, Prove, Validate, Propose, Decide, Deliver, Operate, Expand) from November 2026 to April 2027, with signature on January 29, 2027.
Figure 9.1 · Dennergo mutual action plan, Nov 2026 to Apr 2027. Diamonds are single-day milestones; the dashed line is target signature.

MAP hygiene rules

  • The customer owns ≥50% of milestones
  • Data milestones are explicit (the biggest stall risk)
  • Every milestone has an owner and a date
  • Reviewed weekly; changes logged
  • Post-sale value milestones included

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Part V

Focus & Grow

Tiering, buying triggers and land-and-expand motions.

Section 10 · Spend time where the score says, not where the logo says

Account Tiering

Score = Fit (0–40) + Potential (0–30) + Intent/Triggers (0–20) + Access (0–10). Tier 1 ≥75; Tier 2 55–74; Tier 3 35–54; Tier 4 <35 or self-serve. Weights are illustrative.

Fit · 0–40

Is this our kind of account?

Segment, number of sites or depots, EV program stage, grid and tariff complexity, region priority.

Potential · 0–30

How big can it get?

Sites × modules (Plan, Operate, Flex) whitespace.

Intent · 0–20

Why would they move now?

Active triggers from Section 11.

Access · 0–10

Can we reach the decision?

Champion, EB access, partner relationship.

Stacked horizontal bars scoring eight fictional accounts on fit, potential, intent and access, with tier thresholds at 35, 55 and 75; Dennergo scores highest at 87, Tier 1.
Figure 10.1 · Sample territory scored with the model (fictional accounts, illustrative scores).
TierDefinition / criteriaExample profilesCoverage modelEngagement cadencePrimary playsResource allocation
Tier 1StrategicScore ≥75; ≥50 sites or depots, or a strategic partner or logo; multi-module potentialRegional or national CPO; national EPC partner; large REIT; national convenience-retail chain; large logistics fleetAE + CEO/CRO sponsor + analyst lead + advisorWeekly AE; monthly exec; quarterly business reviewMotions A, B, C, D~50% of AE time; reserved analyst capacity
Tier 2GrowthScore 55–74; 10–50 sites or an active projectMid-size CPO; regional EPC; multi-site property manager; city or transit agencyAE + pooled analystBi-weeklyMotions A, C, E~30% of AE time
Tier 3DevelopScore 35–54; early stage or small portfolioSingle-site developer; small fleet; consultancyAE / inside follow-up; partner-ledMonthly or trigger-basedPortfolio Screen → site assessment; partner referral~15% of AE time
Tier 4Self-serve / PartnerScore <35Small property owners; uploads below thresholdProduct-led + partnersAutomated nurturePortfolio Screen; content~5%

Tiering governance

  • Re-score annually and on triggers
  • Maximum Tier 1 accounts per AE ≈10 (illustrative)
  • Tier changes approved by the CRO
  • Tier drives exec coverage, MAP requirement and deal-review frequency

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Section 11 · Twenty signals that make an account worth a call this week

Buying Triggers & Events

Sources: news, social and professional-network alerts, state and federal funding announcements, utility tariff filings, trade shows, Portfolio Screen uploads and partner intel. Urgency: H = act within 1 week; M = within 30 days; L = nurture. Items marked GK should be re-verified.

TriggerCategorySignal sourceWhy it mattersRecommended playLead offerUrgency
Portfolio Screen uploadProduct signalPlatform notificationHand-raiser with portfolio dataReadout within 2 days; propose site designsPlan site packHigh
Underperforming or aging charging networkOperationalCPO disclosures; reliability studies; customer intelOptimization beats expansion as networks age (S11)Brownfield performance reviewSite performance reviewHigh
CPO network acquisition or consolidationStrategicPress releasesThe new owner must evaluate acquired sitesPortfolio assessment of acquired sitesBrownfield reviewHigh
Federal incentive loss (30C after Jun 30, 2026; 45W after Sep 30, 2025)PolicyTax guidance (S20)Pipeline projects need re-modelling"Re-model your pipeline" campaignPlan re-evaluationHigh
Federal or state charging-program round or awardFundingState DOT plans; federal program reports (S20)Funded projects need bankable designs fastEngage awardees and their EPCsGreenfield assessmentHigh
Utility tariff or demand-charge changeEnergyUtility rate casesEconomics shift; the storage case changesTariff-impact scenarioPlan + OperateMedium
Grid-upgrade delay or interconnection queueGridCustomer discovery; utility noticesNeeds alternatives (storage, microgrid, managed charging)Grid-alternatives studyMicrogrid workspaceHigh
New depot or fleet-electrification announcementFleetPress, RFPs, sustainability reportsNeeds a depot design and fleet planFleet transition studyFleet + Hub workspacesHigh
Fleet vehicle replacement cycleFleetFleet data; lease expirationsA natural decision windowTCO comparisonFleet workspaceMedium
REIT / CRE ESG commitment or tenant EV demandReal estateESG reports; real-estate tech expos (S17)NOI and tenant-retention playPortfolio ScreenReal-estate offerMedium
EV-ready building codes or parking mandates (state codes, GK)RegulatoryCode updatesCompliance-driven installs need right-sizingCode-compliance designPlanMedium
Retail or convenience chain EV programRetailPress; CPO partner newsMulti-site rapid evaluationMulti-site greenfield packPortfolio Screen + PlanHigh
EPC or installer wins a multi-site contractPartnerPartner intel; pressThe EPC needs fast, bankable designsPartner trial / per-projectPartner offerHigh
Storage or solar added at charging sitesTechnologyCustomer plans; vendor newsOperate / Flex opportunitySizing + Operate pilotOperateMedium
Demand-response or VPP program opening (FERC Order 2222 market rules, GK)MarketGrid operator / utility announcementsNew revenue streamsFlex eligibility assessmentFlex (validate)Medium
Financing event (raise, tax equity, portfolio debt)FinancialPress; financier intelLenders demand bankable modelsInvestor-grade report for lender diligencePlan reportHigh
City climate plan or grant deadlinePublic sectorCouncil agendas; grant calendarsNeeds funding-ready financialsCity planning studyCities workflowHigh
New executive (VP Network, Head of Fleet, CFO, Sustainability)OrganizationalProfessional networksNew mandates; vendor reviewPOV meeting within 30 daysAccount POVMedium
Trade-show interactionMarketingBooth scans; meetingsWarm interest48-hour follow-up; demoDemo / Portfolio ScreenHigh
Charger hardware end-of-life or warranty expiryOperationalCharger inventoryAn upgrade decision is dueUpgrade design caseBrownfield reviewMedium

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Section 12 · Six motions, each with a land offer and three expand steps

Land & Expand Motions

One row per motion. Write the chosen motion, with dates, into the account plan (Section 05).

MotionLand offerEntry personaExpand step 1Expand step 2Expand step 3Proof points / KPIsRisks / watch-outs
A. Real estate: Screen → designs → operationsFree Portfolio Screen (≤15 sites)Asset / Portfolio Manager; Capital PlanningPaid sites beyond 15 ($45/site) + Plan designs for top-ranked sitesPortfolio subscription (multi-user) for capital planningOperate on built sites; Flex or charging-as-a-service modelsUploads→paid %; sites designed; NOI uplift modelledOwners delegating to vendors; slow capex decisions
B. EPC partner: per-project → platform → embedded offerPer-project Plan analysis for live bidsEPC Principal; Proposal LeadPlatform subscription with seats for the EPC teamCo-delivered brownfield reviews for the EPC's CPO clientsOperate + O&M bundle with the EPC's maintenance servicesProjects per quarter; partner-sourced ARR; bid win rateEPC sees overlap with its engineering; end-client access
C. CPO brownfield: review → upgrades → Operate → FlexSite performance review (10–40 sites)VP Network / Head of OpsUpgrade designs (charger sizing, storage, ops changes) for top sitesOperate across upgraded hubsFlex aggregation of storage and flexible loadSites reviewed; % uplift realized vs the 18–24% claim; $ demand charges savedData access; capex constraints delaying upgrades
D. Fleet: study → depot design → operations → networkFleet transition study (1 depot or segment)Head of Fleet; Sustainability; CFODepot charging + microgrid designOperate at the depot (cost minimization, scheduling)Roll out to more depots and regions; partner bundlesVehicles planned; depots designed; TCO savings45W loss changing economics; vehicle delivery delays
E. Cities: plan → platform → reportingProgram-level planning study for grant applicationsSustainability Director; Transit / Fleet leadMulti-department platform accessOngoing emissions tracking and progress reportingPublic charging network design and operationsGrants won; emissions tracked; departments onboardedProcurement cycles; political change
F. Developers & financiers: screening → pipeline → portfolio opsInvestor-grade reports for deal screeningInvestment Director; Energy DeveloperPipeline subscription (many sites and scenarios)Lender-standard reporting across the portfolioOperate / Flex for owned assetsDeals screened; time to closeLender acceptance of reports
Four-step expansion path for Dennergo: land with a brownfield review of 18 sites, expand to upgrade designs and an Operate pilot, then Operate across 17 hubs, then Flex on 9 storage sites, with cumulative illustrative account value rising to about 540 thousand dollars.
Figure 12.1 · Motion C at Dennergo: an illustrative three-year expansion path (first-year value per step, $K).

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Part VI

Field Kit

Sequences, talk tracks and objection handling.

Section 13 · What to say, in what order, to whom

Field Kit: Sequences & Talk Tracks

The process is only as good as the conversations inside it. This kit gives Garallen Company sellers a way to read an account's urgency, a 30-minute first-call structure, a trigger-led outreach sequence written for Dennergo, persona talk tracks and objection responses. Adapt the words; keep the structure.

13.1 Read the room: account phase

Six-step ladder of account phases from status quo to decision-ready: just built or standardized, no pain, some pain, no longer fits economics or policy, sites failing, and a forced event, each with the recommended Garallen Company angle.
Figure 13.1 · Accounts can enter at any phase and move at any time. The higher the phase, the higher the urgency.

13.2 Anatomy of a 30-minute first call

Timeline of a thirty-minute first call: pre-call research, two minutes of introductions and agenda, fifteen minutes of discovery, eight minutes of point of view and fit, and five minutes of next steps.
Figure 13.2 · First-call structure. Talk less than 40% of the time; leave with a dated next step.

Understand

Their sites and their numbers

Utilization spread, demand-charge share of the bill, sites at end of warranty, projects that assumed 30C.

Find

The people

Who owns the investment decision, who owns the data, who has to sign off on security.

Establish

Priority and timing

What is compelling about this quarter? Board meeting, budget lock, acquisition integration, rate case.

Agree

A next step with a date

A readout, a data request, or a working session with finance. Never "I'll send some info".

13.3 Trigger-led sequence: VP Network Development, Dennergo

Trigger: Dennergo's acquisition of the 22-site Sagebrush network plus the loss of 30C eligibility on planned builds. Seven touches over 18 business days across email, phone, social and an executive introduction. Personalize the bracketed fields; never send a touch without a reason to exist.

Timeline of seven outreach touches over eighteen days: email on day 1, social connect on day 2, call and voicemail on day 4, email on day 7, executive introduction on day 10, call on day 14 and a final email on day 18.
  1. Day 1 Email22 new sites, 14 re-priced builds

    Daniel, congratulations on closing the Sagebrush acquisition. Two things usually land on a network lead's desk right after a deal like that: deciding which acquired sites to upgrade, keep or retire, and re-checking planned builds that assumed the 30C credit. We help CPOs answer both with site-level models their CFO will accept, typically within a business day of getting the data. Worth 20 minutes to compare notes on how you're sequencing the integration?

  2. Day 2 SocialConnect request

    Daniel, I follow Dennergo's Mountain West build-out and work with operators on site economics after the federal credit changes. Would be glad to connect.

  3. Day 4 Call + voicemail

    Daniel, it's [Name] at Garallen Company. I'm calling about the Sagebrush sites. Most operators we work with find a handful of acquired sites carry most of the demand-charge risk. I have a one-page view on how to find them fast. I'll send it over; my number is [phone].

  4. Day 7 EmailThe 30C math on your 2H builds

    Daniel, a quick follow-up with a specific idea. Projects placed in service after June 30 no longer get 30C, so builds approved last year at an 11–12% hurdle can quietly fall under it. A re-model usually changes one of three things: site order, charger count or storage size. Attached is a one-page example (illustrative data) showing what changes. Open to a 20-minute walkthrough?

  5. Day 10 Exec introFrom our CEO

    Lena Marchetti (CEO) writes to Teresa Valdez: a short note on Mountain West network integration, one insight from similar operators, and an offer of a 20-minute executive exchange. Copy Daniel.

  6. Day 14 Call

    Reference the CEO note. Ask one question: "Of the 22 Sagebrush sites, how many do you already know you'd keep at today's tariffs?" If he engages, book the readout; if not, ask who owns the integration model.

  7. Day 18 EmailClosing the loop

    Daniel, I'll stop here so I don't clutter your inbox. If it's useful later, you can upload up to 15 site addresses to our free Portfolio Screen and get a ranked view in a day, no call needed. If integration planning picks up after the budget lock, I'd be glad to help.

13.4 Persona talk tracks

CFO

Defensible returns and fewer capital surprises

"Every site in your plan was approved under assumptions that changed this year. We re-run each one with your hurdle rate, current tariffs and no 30C, and an analyst checks the result before you see it. You get a model your board and lender can audit, not a vendor's estimate."

Ask: What hurdle rate does the board apply, and which projects are closest to it?

Director, Site Operations

Fewer failing sites and demand-charge surprises

"Most networks have a short list of sites that cause most of the pain. We rank every site by upside and tell you what to change, whether that's chargers, storage, pricing or hours, before your crews roll a truck."

Ask: Which five sites would you fix first if budget weren't the question?

Energy & Grid Manager

Models they can trust and defend

"The engine is deterministic: same inputs, same answer, every time, with every assumption logged. Where you don't have interval data yet, we start from documented defaults and you approve them."

Ask: Which inputs do you trust today, and which are guesses?

Head of IT & Security

Low-risk data handling

"We need tariffs, interval data and charger inventory, not customer payment data. Access is role-based, onboarding data can be anonymized, and our security pack answers the standard questionnaire. I'll only claim the certifications our Security lead has confirmed in writing."

Ask: What does your vendor review require, and how long does it usually take?

13.5 Objection handling

ObjectionResponseThen ask
"Our spreadsheet / engineering firm handles this.""Keep them. Most of our customers do. We make each study take a day instead of six weeks, so you can re-check every site when a tariff or policy changes instead of once per project.""When did you last re-run the whole portfolio, and what did it cost?"
"The charger vendor designs it for free.""Their design answers 'which charger'. It doesn't answer 'is this site worth building, and how big should the battery be'. We're vendor-neutral, so the answer isn't tied to a product.""Who on your team checks the vendor's assumptions today?"
"No budget until next fiscal year.""Understood. A paid review is usually less than one avoided overbuild, and the fee can be credited to a later order. Can we size the decision now so it's in the FY27 plan before budgets lock?""What has to be true for this to make the December budget?"
"You're a small company. What if you're not around?""Fair question. Reports and models are exportable and auditable, so the decision stands on its own. We'll walk your team through our security pack and give you references from operators your size.""What would you need to see to be comfortable?"
"Just send me some information.""Happy to. So it's useful and not generic: which decision is closest, the acquired sites or the planned builds?""Can I send it with 15 minutes on Thursday to walk through it?"

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Appendix

Appendix

Adaptation notes and the evidence register.

Appendix A · What was adapted, what was assumed, who validates

Accuracy & Adaptation Notes

This playbook adapts a reference enterprise-playbook structure (originally written for a hardware-plus-cloud field-sales motion) to Garallen Company's SaaS-plus-analyst model. Prepared from public sources as of Oct 16, 2026 for Garallen Company's revenue team; not yet reviewed by Garallen Company leadership. Items marked Assumption or Inferred need validation.

ItemReference template elementGarallen Company adaptationBasisValidation ownerOpen question
Stage sequence8 stages (Prep → Discovery → Demo → Trial → Best Practices → Site Walk → Pricing → Close)Same sequence; Site Walk = Site Data Intake & Assessment; Best Practices = five-discipline value validationAdaptationCRODo CRM stages already exist under different names?
DemoHardware and cloud platform demoScenario demo on the customer's site or fleet + sample investor-grade reportSourced capabilities (S1, S3)CRO / ProductIs there a standard demo tenant and script?
TrialFree hardware trialsPortfolio Screen free tier (≤15 sites), paid assessments, Operate pilotFree tier Sourced (S4); paid-pilot policy AssumptionCRO / COOOfficial pilot pricing and credit policy
QualificationMEDDPICCMEDDPICC-D (Data readiness)AdaptationCROPreferred methodology?
ChannelValue-added resellersEPCs, consultancies, hardware and EV-conversion partners, CPO/site-host consortiaSourced partners (S11–S13, S17); program terms AssumptionCROFormal partner program and margins?
Product namingHardware product linesGarallen Plan / Operate / Flex; "SiteLens" (Apr 2026 release)Sourced, inconsistentProduct / MarketingCanonical product names and packaging
Operate & Flex maturity—Positioned as expand modules with "validate GA" flagsOn the website; no launch release foundR&D lead / CEOGA status, reference deployments, supported markets and protocols
PricingHardware list pricesOnly public: $45 per additional site (Portfolio Screen); all else placeholdersSourced (S4) / AssumptionCRO / COOPrice book, ACV benchmarks, discount guardrails
Thresholds & targetsField activity metricsIllustrative ($25K deal review, activity counts, tier scores)AssumptionCROCalibrate to quota and analyst capacity
ToolsInternal sales toolsCRM (assumed), social-selling tool (assumed), scheduling link (sourced), e-signature (assumed)Mostly AssumptionCOO / RevOpsActual CRM and sales stack
Security claims—Use only S8 statements; ISO references need confirmationSourced, unverifiedCOOWhich certifications are formally held?
Funding & headcount—Ranges from third-party databasesSourced, conflictingCEO / FinanceApproved company facts for sales decks
Advisor bio—Utility advisor: website says former distribution-planning executive; a professional-network profile lists a different prior roleSourced, partly inconsistentCROApproved advisor bios
CompetitorsHardware competitorsTelematics-led tools, fleet-planning startups, microgrid design software, charging/DERMS/VPP vendors, consultantsSourced (S19) + GKCROOfficial battlecards and win/loss data
Policy facts—30C / 45W / federal program per S20; state codes, FERC Order 2222 and clean-fuel credits = GKMixedCRO / AdvisorsRe-verify before customer use
Worked ROI example—Illustrative Dennergo case (Section 07)AssumptionAnalyst leadReplace with an anonymized real customer result

Open items for Garallen Company leadership

  • Canonical product names and packaging (Plan vs SiteLens; Operate and Flex availability)
  • Price book, pilot policy and partner terms
  • CRM and sales tools in use; stage definitions
  • Reference customers and case-study permissions (EPC brownfield, retail rollout, earlier pilots)
  • Security certifications and the standard security pack
  • Analyst QA capacity model and SLA commitments
  • Target regions and segments for FY2027 territories

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Appendix B · Every [S#] tag, in one place

Evidence Register

In a delivered playbook, every row links to the exact page or document. In this sample the sources are fictional, so links are omitted.

TagSource
S1Garallen Company homepage: platform, modules (Plan, Operate, Flex), segments, advantages, offices
S2Garallen Company About page: positioning ("embedded project partner"), leadership and industry advisors
S3Garallen Plan module page: features, integrations, standards, workflow, one-business-day QA'd report
S4Garallen Company for Real Estate: Portfolio Screen, pricing ($45 per additional site, 15-site free tier), personas
S5Garallen Company Applications page: value by persona (finance, fleet, charging hub, property)
S6Garallen Company sector pages: Logistics and Cities (Project / Fleet / Hub / Microgrid workspaces)
S7Garallen Company blog: "Why charging projects underperform" (five disciplines), May 2025, + Insights index
S8Garallen Company Security & Data Privacy page (multi-tenant, anonymization, public-cloud hosting)
S9Garallen Company Careers page (engineering roles only)
S10Garallen Company Events: GA launch (Mar 2024), trade-media webinar (Oct 2024), 2025 roadshow (10 US cities)
S11Press release, Apr 2026: EPC partner selects Garallen Company to re-evaluate 31 charging sites (CO/UT/AZ); "SiteLens"
S12Press release and trade article, 2025: Garallen Company's role in a 24-store convenience-retail EV rollout
S13Consultancy partnership announcement, Jun 2024
S14Press release, Mar 2024: platform upgrades (sensitivity analysis, carbon calculations)
S15Startup-ecosystem company profile (earlier pilots; GA Q1 2024)
S16Funding databases (figures conflict)
S17Garallen Company professional-network page; expo booth post (Jun 2026); partner and event posts (2025)
S18Contact-data and professional-network search snippets: headcount ~22, ~2 sales staff
S19Competitor product pages: telematics suitability, fleet-planning and assessment tools
S20Federal tax-credit guidance (30C, 45W) and a congressional research report on the federal charging program
S21Garallen Company white paper (fleet conversion and energy management)
GKGeneral industry knowledge not re-verified in this pass (microgrid tools, VPP vendors, make-ready programs, FERC Order 2222, clean-fuel credits, state codes, MEDDPICC)

↑ Back to the topSample playbook. Company names and data are illustrative.

Product: Enterprise Playbook

A custom outbound playbook, built for your business

Thinking about becoming a Cashewleads customer? Start with a playbook built around your own company: your ICP, target segments, messaging, qualification and outbound plan. It is custom-built from your intake answers and delivered by Cashewleads. It is prepared by our team, not a generic download.

Get your custom playbook

$499.00one-time
Checkout is not open yet. Have a promo code? Enter it on the last step.

Delivered after review. Choose the full 17-section playbook or a shorter 10-section version in the intake.

How it works

  1. 1Fill in the intake. A guided questionnaire about your company, buyers, sales motion and deal model. About 10-20 minutes; optional questions can be skipped.
  2. 2We build it. The Cashewleads team builds your playbook by hand from your answers, with AI assistance, and reviews it.
  3. 3Delivered to you. Your finished playbook is delivered by email after review.

What you get

  • Your ideal customer profile

    Who is a great fit, how to tier accounts, and the target segments to go after first.

  • Messaging for your buyers

    Positioning, value pillars, and outbound messaging and cadence written around your offer and your personas.

  • Qualification and sales process

    A qualification framework, stage criteria and a discovery guide your team can use.

  • Objections and competitive positioning

    Responses built only from the claims and proof you give us.

  • An outbound plan

    A 30/60/90 rollout with the metrics and operating rhythm to run it.

  • Gaps flagged, never guessed

    Anything we cannot know from your answers is marked [Needs input], not invented.

Built only from what you tell us. We never invent customers, statistics or quotes. See the full intake and section list.